It Was Necessary For The Human Race - 1160 Words

Zinn’s question if the bloodshed and deceit were necessary in order for the human race to progress one might argue that yes it was necessary, to a certain extent. If the English did not colonize America, maybe it would not be what it is today. The Europeans came here with their tools and influence over the country. The colonist used the bloodshed in order to control the Native Americans, the Africans, and even their own people. They did not want them to rebel therefore, they devised systems in order to manipulate them. Even though they implemented these systems, the Native Americans and the Africans Indians rebelled against the Europeans. The Europeans would oppress the people, imprisoned and punish them in order to have†¦show more content†¦On the other hand, one may also argue that it was not completely necessary for the bloodshed to occur because there could have been alternative methods for each situation in the colonies. The Europeans would kill and hang the peop le to send a message to the other slaves, not disobey them or they will be punished for it. However, what if they simply did not have slavery period and just paid these people to work the land. That way, they would not have the need to ‘rebel’ and get punished for it. Another instant were England could have chosen an alternative path, Zinn wrote about England wanted to rid themselves of prisoners and beggars; these people were stripped, beaten bloody and then sent to work out of the country to America. They were sent as indentured servants, perhaps England could have sent them without beating them because traveling to America was punishment enough, and they were away from their families. There was a lack of food on board, some of them died and were thrown overboard. Additionally, the distress of the people was apparent, they were hungry due to the shortage of food; these people suffered. Some of them were reduced to cannibalism. Zinn mentions that women were raped and p regnant women were thrown overboard. It was not necessary for them to be beaten bloody in order for the human race to progress because they suffered enough just traveling to America. Moreover, ‘Richard Frethorne,

The Death Of Physician Assisted Suicide - 1731 Words

Die With Dignity It is obvious this is a very controversial issue that is discussed daily by those who wish to die to avoid loss of dignity and also by those who think it could be immoral. For physician-assisted suicide to even be considered the patient must be of sound mind when they are requesting the physician-assisted suicide. To guarantee that the process is carried out correctly a doctor or a witness should be there to prove consciousness. The patient must be diagnosed with a terminal illness, if they are not then there is a possibility for a life. There are many pro’s and con’s to physician-assisted suicide. If a person is terminally ill they would not be in any suffering and they could die with dignity. It is also proven that hospitals would save money, and it could possibly cut some of the deficit. Although it sounds immoral, having a terminally ill person in the family can create many problems, so in this case it would be positive because there would be no more burden. It is q uite possible that passing this law would create a damper on the low income and middle class. For many it goes against the separation of church and state, because many believe that dying that way is a sin. It is very possible that miracle cures will arise shortly after a person has partaken in the physician-assisted suicide. In all reality, the government insurance companies and hospitals will want to force this process because it would save them a great deal of money in the long run.Show MoreRelatedPhysician Assisted Death And Assisted Suicide Essay1114 Words   |  5 Pages Physician assisted death is a physician aiding in a patient’s death by prescribing a lethal dosage or informing a patient on a lethal amount of medication. This is not a new phenomenon, over the ages of medicine physicians have been asked by patients to end their suffering. More than half of physicians in today’s society have been asked in some form of way to participate in physician assisted death. People should be able to choose rather or not to end their life through terminal illness or inRead MoreThe Death Of Physician Assisted Suicide1991 Words   |  8 PagesOne cannot refuse death. Physician aid-in-death, however, has been targeted for ages by religious groups or those who strictly believe in only prolonging life as a negative thing. Although such reasons are valid, they do not take into consideration the patient s direct wish, feelings, or foresight of how they believe their life will be. Death should be a basic right; same as Physician-Assisted Suicide should be available as an option for those who are mentally competent and terminally ill, or believeRead MoreThe Death Of Physician Assisted Suicide1348 Words   |  6 Pagesleads to suicide. Depression and anxiety is a disease that takes over human-beings self-determination. Many young individuals reach the point of believing the concept of if they were no longer alive the world they are associated in will no l onger be dark and evil. Also, older individuals believe if they take their own life then they will not suffer anymore. Recently in some states, they passed the right to have physician’s helping with planning their client’s death. Physician assisted suicide meansRead MoreThe Death With Dignity And Physician Assisted Suicide1742 Words   |  7 Pagessupporting â€Å"Death with Dignity†, also known as physician-assisted suicide. Oregon, Washington, and Vermont have each enacted laws that enable a terminally ill, mentally competent, adult to decide and dictate end of life decisions up to and including the time of their death. Oregon was the first United States (U.S.) to enact legislation and other states in the union have followed suit. Literature Review There are numerous articles regarding Death with Dignity and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Friend (2011)Read MoreLEGALIZATION OF ASSISTED SUICIDE IN THE U.S. Currently, physician-assisted suicide or death is2900 Words   |  12 PagesLEGALIZATION OF ASSISTED SUICIDE IN THE U.S. Currently, physician-assisted suicide or death is illegal in all states except Oregon, Vermont, Montana and Washington. Present law in other states express that suicide is not a crime, but assisting in suicide is. Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that the moral right to life should encompass the right to voluntary death. Opponents of assisted suicide claim that society has a moral and civic duty to preserve the lives of innocentRead MoreA Case On Proactive Death Such As Physician Assisted Suicide763 Words   |  4 PagesThis essay will reveal different case studies on proactive death such as physician-assisted suicide, pro-life principles to natural death emphasis on life at conception and the circumstances under which proactive efforts are permissible. Physicians assisting in suicide deaths are not productive in this area because some not trained in this field of expertise. Moll assert, doctors, are of little help. They have no training in how to discuss end-of-life issues with families and patients, so they avoidRead MorePhilosophy And Death : An Argument For Physician Assisted Suicide1172 Words   |  5 Pages PHILOSOPHY AND DEATH: AN ARGUMENT FOR PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE EMILY BEDFORD 10107525 Submitted to: Robert Armstrong PHIL 259 Monday, December 7, 2015 Introduction As humans, we have the right to life. In Canada, in section 7 of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadians can expect â€Å"life, liberty and security of the person.† This means not only to simply exist, but have a minimum quality and value in each of our lives. Dying is the last important, intimate, and personal momentRead MorePhysician Assisted Suicide : A Matter Of Life And Death Essay1936 Words   |  8 PagesThere has long been a debate over the topic of physician assisted suicide as an option for end of life. Several countries and states have passed legislation over the last few years that allows physician assisted suicide to have a form of legality therefore giving these terminal patients more autonomy in deciding what end of life care options they can choose. While it is not up to us as healthcare providers to decide for patients what they should or should not do pertaining to end of life care, itRead More The Death With Dignity Act and Physician Assisted Suicide Essay1312 Words   |  6 PagesThe Death With Dignity Act and Physician Assisted Suicide Introduction According to the American Medical Association (1996), physician-assisted suicide (PAS) occurs when a physician facilitates a patient’s death by providing either the means or the information necessary to aid in the patient performing the life-ending act. PAS has had a long and controversial history dating back to the ancient Greeks and Romans. They believed that there was no reason to prolong life if continued pain and sufferingRead MorePhysician Assisted Suicide : Controversial Healthcare And Political Realms Alike1218 Words   |  5 Pages Physician-Assisted Suicide Elissa Munoz-Tucker University of Arizona Abstract Physician-assisted suicide is controversial in healthcare and political realms alike. Currently, this end-of-life option is practiced in five states within the United States. Social concerns regarding assisted suicide revolve around ethical quandaries; providing the means to a patient’s death is contradictory to ethical principles of healthcare providers. Political concerns surrounding

Same Sex Marriages in Australia Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Same Sex Marriages in Australia. Answer: Homosexuality refers to a romantic or sexual relationship or attraction between persons of same sex. It is a category of sexual orientation which means a continuing behavior of attraction of sexual or romantic nature towards a certain gender. Sexual orientation is broadly categorized into heterosexuals (persons attracted to persons of opposite gender), homosexuals (persons attracted to persons of same gender) and bisexuals (persons attracted to both the genders simultaneously). Homosexuals include gays (men attracted to men) and lesbians (women attracted to women). These forms of orientation and relationships were not recognized in ancient times and are still not given recognition in many countries till date. Same sex marriages have been recently given legal recognition in many countries like Argentina, France, United States, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand and most recently in Uruguay in 2017. It is still not recognized in Australia but a huge support is given to such marriages . According to the federallaw of Australia each state and territory is empowered to make laws regarding same sex relationships still their relationship is considered as de-facto relationship. Themarriage law of Australia expressly excludes to give recognition to any form of union other than that of a man and a woman (Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) s 46). Till date almost twenty two Bills related to same sex marriages have been presented before the Parliament of Australia but not a single Bill out of them has been passed (McKeown 2017). The Australian Capital Territory gave recognition to same sex marriages by passing a Marriage Equality (Same Sex) Act, 2013 in December 2013 which was later struck down by the High Court for the reason that it was in contravention of section 46(1) of the Marriage Act 1961 (Cth). According to a survey conducted by Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (HILDA) for evaluating the support of different groups of persons of Australian society for same sex marriages (Smyth 2017) it has been observed that the rate of support for same sex couples to have equal rights with heterosexual couples has considerably increased since 2005 and also the percentage of people who agree that equal rights with heterosexual couples shall be given to the same sex couples has also increased to a great extent. The category of people who are in support of the equal rights of same sex couples includes women, homosexuals, young people, non- religious people, persons of high- income group and persons living in major cities (Perales Campbell, 2017). A recent voting has been conducted in Australia as an initiative of the coalition government of Malcom Turnbull to know the view of general public regarding the validation of same sex marriages in Australia as the issue of same sex marriage was the major topic of discussion during 2016 elections (Westcott 2017). According to a report of news.com there is a need for change in Marriage laws of Australia to legalize the same sex marriages. The legalization of homosexual marriages will not interfere with the rights of religious marriages which are different from legal marriages whereby the religious leaders will still hold the right to refuse to marry homosexual couples. The homosexual marriages are not connected to religious rites rather it is a custom which is as old as the tribal groups of Britain. A number of religious institutions are concerned that if homosexual marriages are given recognition they will be compelled to perform against their religious beliefs but these institutions are given privilege to discriminate persons on the grounds of gender, LGBT status, relationship status or pregnancy which gives them right to refuse to marry homosexual couples. As the Marriage Act of Australia does not gives legal recognition to the same sex marriages, it also does not recognizes any same sex marriage taken place outside Australia. Therefore, the homosexual couples who get married outside Australia in a country of which they are not the citizen, cannot get divorced after returning to Australia, neither do they can get divorced in the country in which they got married as they are not a citizen of that country. This the couple gets jammed into a legal midpoint. Further according to the FamilyLaw Act, if a married heterosexual woman becomes pregnant by having access to IVF, foster or adoption facility with the consent of her husband they become legal parent of the child but homosexual parents are required to prove their de facto relationship at the time of taking the procedure. Marriage gives legal status to heterosexual parents which is not available to homosexual parents until they are lawfully married. All married parents and even the non- biological parents have legal parental rights over their children. Since homosexual couples are already raising families allowing them to marry would only strengthen legal rights. In the case of same sex couples, on the death of one of the spouse, the rights of being legally married will sustain which are not available to the de facto couples. The heterosexual de facto couples of Australia face the same conditions as the homosexual couples do but they have right to marry which the latter do not have. Legalizing the same sex marriages will also give property rights to their children as marriage gives legal status to the children from the marriage. Further the legalizing will also give rights in the property of the spouse in case of the death of either of them. On the other hand, legalizing of the same sex marriages has some disadvantages. One of such disadvantage is the possibility of emergence of sexual experimentation especially in the younger generation. These acts of carnal experimentation will give bring complexities, rise in sexual diseases, etc. Further it would also complicate the courts oflaw to decide and make bifurcation regarding the rights and liabilities of the parties in cases of dispute arising from the same- sex marriages. Younger generation of homosexuals will be prone to major risk of sexual and mental health concerns. As per certain researches that have been conducted in countries that have already legalized homosexual marriages, it was found that the young homosexuals are experiencing social discrimination for their orientation which is expected to increase in case the homosexual marriages are not given legal recognition. It has been seen in the countries where homosexual marriages has been legalized that no mental health problems arise in those groups of homosexuals (The Conversation 2017). Therefore it may be summarized that in the recent voting that took place in Australia regarding the legalizing of the same sex couples shows that majority of the public is in its support. However, certain sections of the society are still not in the support a large number of people want the homosexuals to get rights under the marriage law. Marriage does not have its place to any religious group even if they have right to perform it. Customs change, and few customs have changed as much as the custom of marriage. With regard to the dispute that marriage is for the reproduction of children, this does not stand up to inspection. A number of mature couples marry despite the fact that they are unable to procreate or reproduce children. Younger couples are not obligated to show their productiveness before getting married. If the marriage laws are regarding the procreation of children, then participants should ask the newly married couples to make a pledge to endeavor to produce children. Participants are already obligated to make the statement that according to the Australian law marriages are a union of man and woman and not of others and it should be added that it is also for the purpose procreating children. This will be highly criticized by many couples who are unable to procreate children or do not want to have one. This should not stop them from marrying. By banning homosexual marriages, there will be a adverse effect on the lives of homosexual people. This means that banning homosexual marriages would restrain the religious autonomy of homosexual people. Either it can be believed that homosexual marriages are a legitimate practice or not. A large number of Australians believe that homosexual marriages is neither fundamentally destructive nor immoral. The practice of homosexuality has no negative effects upon those who elect not to involve in it. Therefore, the Government has no room in banning it and no room in discriminating against the persons who practice it. References: McKeown, D 2017, Chronology of same sex marriage bills introduced into the federal parliament: a quick guide. Available from: https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1617/Quick_Guides/SSMarriageBills. [23 September 2017]. Marriage Act 1961 (Cth). Perales, F. Campbell, A. 2017. Who supports same-sex marriage in Australia? And who doesnt? University of Queensland. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-31/same-sex-marriage-who-supports-it-and-who-doesnt-hilda-data/8856884. [23 September 2017]. Smyth, J. (2017). Same- sex marriages reignites Australias culture wars. Financial Times. Available from: https://www.ft.com/content/f793f132-96f8-11e7-b83c-9588e51488a0. [23 September 2017]. The Conversation (2017) Legalising same-sex marriage will help reduce high rates of suicide among young people in Ausralia. Available from: https://theconversation.com/legalising-same-sex-marriage-will-help-reduce-high-rates-of-suicide-among-young-people-in-australia-82917. [23 September 2017]. Westcott, B. (2017). Australia votes on same- sex marriage: What you need to know. CNN. Available from: https://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/04/asia/australia-same-sex-marriage-explainer/index.html. [23 September 2017].